```Subject: Re: How Should We *Motivate* Students in Intro Stat?

To: edstat-l@jse.stat.ncsu.edu
sci.stat.edu Usenet newsgroup

From: Donald Macnaughton <donmac@matstat.com>
(formerly donmac@hookup.net)

Date: Wednesday December 18, 1996 21:14 EDT

Cc: Dennis Roberts <dmr@email.psu.edu>```

```On December 17, 1996, Dennis Roberts wrote

> i was not implying that there is 0 accuracy ... it is just when
> a term like "accurate" is bandied about ... one gets the im-
> pression that the error is relatively small. but .. for most
> predictors and criteria ... when predicting human behavior var-
> iables ... the errors variance is normally greater ... many
> times MUCH greater ... than the predictable variance.  that's
> ALL i meant ...

Dennis makes an important point:  When we show students how the
field of statistics helps researchers to make "accurate" predic-
tions, we must explain what we mean by the word "accurate".  We
must also inform students that statistical methods can usually
provide us with an estimate of the size of the *errors* in the
predictions that (on the basis of the available research data)
the procedure will make.

(Furthermore, as is well known, we must explain to students the
concept of the *underlying assumptions* of statistical procedures
because an estimate of size of the prediction errors will be re-
liable only if the underlying assumptions of the associated sta-
tistical procedure are adequately satisfied.)

I give an approach to discussing these matters with students in a
paper for students (1996, sections 11.2, 9.4, 9.10, and 11.4).

Don Macnaughton

REFERENCE
Macnaughton, D. B. (1996), "The Entity-Property-Relationship Ap-
proach to Statistics:  An Introduction for Students."  Avail-
able at http://www.matstat.com/teach/

```

Home page for Entity-Property-Relationship Approach to Introductory Statistics